1939: The
Journal of the American Medical Association published a brief and
unfavorable review [right] of the
book Alcoholics Anonymous, which concluded:The book under review is a curious combination of organizing propaganda and religious exhortation. It is in no sense a scientific book, although it is introduced by a letter from a physician who claims to know some of the anonymous contributors who have been “cured” of addiction to alcohol and have joined together in an organization which would save other addicts by a kind of religious conversion. The book contains instructions as to how to intrigue the alcoholic addict into the acceptance of divine guidance in place of alcohol in terms strongly reminiscent of Dale Carnegie and the adherents of the Buchman (“Oxford”) movement. The one valid thing in the book is the recognition of the seriousness of addiction to alcohol. Other than this, the book has no scientific merit or interest.
Dr. Foster Kennedy [left], a
world-renowned neurologist who treated alcoholics at Bellevue Hospital in New
York City, responded with a letter to the Editor. At the Rockefeller dinner
for Alcoholics Anonymous on 8 February 1940, he spoke about it: “I did not
like that review much, and I sent a letter to the editor of the Journal of the
American Medical Association and asked him to put it among the, oh, trivia, or
whatever they would put it in. But he wrote a very decent letter back and said
he thought no good purpose could be served by publishing my letter. One never
likes to see one’s child aborted, so I thought I would read you my reply
here:
Sir:An unsigned review appeared in the Journal of the American Medical Association October 14th of ‘Alcoholics Anonymous,’ the story of how more than 100 men have recovered from alcoholism. The cheapish tone of the review is surely a reflection on the thoughtfulness, the experience, and the innate kindliness of the reviewer, and not at all indicative of lack of humane spirit in the Journal.
The aim of those concerned in this effort against alcoholism is high, their success has been considerable and I believe medical men of good will should aid these decent people rather than loftily condemn them for not being scientific.
One might ask the reviewer to produce a book on the subject of alcoholism concocted by him out of “pure science.” Medicine, surely, is Science touched with emotion. It is quicker and more precious in vivo than in vitro. This group of workers I have regarded as enlisting Belief and the herd-instinct to fortify and implement emotionally men’s actions. In doing so they have chosen well-tried weapons. It would be unfortunate if the opinion of your “Cynic Anonymous” be given too wide credence by our profession which has never before refused to use faith to move mountains.
I thank you.”
1940: [Early] The original A.A. group in
Baltimore, Maryland, which had held its first meeting in James “Jim” R.’s home
four months earlier, on 16 June, moved to the basement of the Altamont Hotel
at 1215 Eutaw Street [left]. After
several months, they would have to move so the hotel could accommodate the
processing of World War II draftees into the military.
1940: Bill W. traveled to
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to speak with Judge William Curtis Bok
[left, 1933], who had heard high praise for Alcoholics Anonymous (A.A.) from two local
friends, Drs. A. Wiese Hammer
[near right] and C. Dudley Saul [far right], and
wanted to learn more.Bok was one of two heirs to the Curtis Publishing
Company fortune. The company had been founded by Bok’s maternal grandfather,
Cyrus H. K. Curtis, but Bok never held a official position at Curtis
Publishing or any of its
many magazines or newspapers; instead, he served as a
judge from 1936 until his death in 1962. Nonetheless, in December, he would
ask Jack Alexander [left] to write a
story about A.A. for The Saturday Evening Post, which, at that time,
had the largest circulation of any general magazine in the U.S., boasting a
readership of 3 million.

































